Sunday, December 14, 2014

Long Distance Dreamers

Part One: A twenty-something, late bloomer's reflections on maturity milestones + life stages

"we must have adventures in order to know where we truly belong."

Travelling is one of those things society says you’re expected to do when young or in your twenties, ideally, before you settle down. I’ve always found it strange how we’re expected to do all or most of our travelling during our poorest years, while trying to balance work and study, renting or living at home. Keep in mind that I’m talking about big trips here, which may involve solo travel or an element of risk/emotional investment. Short, low budget trips or those paid by others are deliciously easy. I can understand why you would want to save up for a big trip as soon as possible — life is too short not to experience more of what the world has to offer, but the rush and pressure to “do/have it all” in our twenties is frankly ridiculous. 

According to astrology, our cosmic itineraries can occur either through the third house of self-expression, short trips and local communities, or the ninth house of higher education, philosophical expansion and long distance travel. Since I have Saturn and Neptune in the ninth house, and Mercury in the third house, travel for me needs to be healing, meaningful and a source of creative inspiration. It doesn't have to expensive or elaborate, I believe the simple act of trying new things in your own city can be culturally rewarding. I would prefer to travel with a purpose, or once I've found my 'purpose'  ideally as an extended period of soul searching, to blog about my discoveries, or photograph beautiful landscapes. I currently travel to the US approximately every two years to visit relatives, which falls under the purposeful umbrella. I want to travel properly when I find compatible companions and feel financially stable, when I have an amazing life for me waiting back home, so I know I'm not needing to escape from my problems. 

I possess a competing desire to establish roots while I'm young — a sanctuary to call home, yet gradually uprooting my attachment to any particular time and place. Only my intuition can know when the right time will be. I wouldn't pass up the opportunity to travel in my early 20s with the right people, but if I have to go alone, it will possibly be in my late 20s, 30s or even 40s..? That’s the beauty of not having goals that revolve around marriage and kids, I don’t feel the need to cram all my fun and options into a single decade. My dreams will change for the better. I will aspire to visit places which need me just as much as I need them. I will be more than just a tourist, mapping new internal universes. I will be expanding my comprehension of home. 

To be updated later.. intentional reflections on:
  • Finding purpose and giving back
  • Dating, relationships and 'settling down'

Wednesday, November 26, 2014

Cultural Evolution In A World of Moral Tribes

Originally published in SHIFT Magazine Issue #6 "Earth Community"

Many sustainability writers and activists believe that we need a mythopoetic vision – a new story to replace the old – in order to heal and transcend the ruins of industrial civilization. This emerging story relies on an idealistic vision of the convergence of universal human values – the expectation that it is our job as activists to change people at their core to adopt peaceful, eco-conscious and ‘awakened’ values.
While this may seem like a humane, noble pursuit, geopolitical unrest and division continues to exist in a world of moral tribes, underpinned by divergent, seemingly irreconcilable worldviews and ideologies. According to cultural historian Richard Tarnas, author of Cosmos and Psyche: Intimations of a New World View, the evolution of Western culture and intellectual history has taken place within a paradoxical context of competing narratives: the myth of progress and enlightened modernity versus the myth of civilization’s fall from unity into separation. These archetypal paradigms are represented in the tension between today’s social movements and major subcultures, and according to sociological research conducted over the last decade they comprise three main groups: Cultural Creatives, Moderns and Traditionalists. (Anderson, S. R. and Ray, P. H., 2001)
Cultural Creatives
SHIFT readers are most likely to recognize themselves in the description of Cultural Creatives, who, clocking in at approximately 50 million of us, tend to be empathic and prosocial, valuing humanitarian and environmental causes over techno-fixes and traditional conservative dogmas. With its roots in the anti-war, civil rights and women’s movements of the 1960s and 70s, this emerging tribe of intuitive healers, subversive artists, teachers, systems thinkers, Gaian mystics, culture-jammers, peaceful activists and revolutionaries are the pioneers of a new chapter in global consciousness.
Due to their deep understanding of global interdependence, Cultural Creatives today are at the forefront of the deep ecology movement, the natural, wholefood, organic movement, the attachment parenting movement, the holistic wellness and authentic vulnerability movement, and so on. Eco-conscious and sensitive to injustice, they are concerned with living principled, sustainable lives, rich with purpose and meaning. While new age spirituality advocates transforming the self as a sufficient means for healing the world, and conventional politics champions collective change at the expense of the individual, Cultural Creatives are both self-aware and politically engaged. They are motivated to integrate the need for community resilience with personal growth and self-actualization, promoting both meaningful social change and inner transformation.
Cultural Creatives can be understood as comprising a core group of dedicated, leading activists – 66% of whom are women – and less involved groups of interested supporters, also known as greens and transitionalists. Greens are generally concerned about climate change, social justice, integrative health and ecology. They may be proactive on the logistical front lines of activism, but tend to place less importance on inner psychological, spiritual or existential experience. Like transitionalists, who are still in the process of developing awareness, some may feel torn between their convictions and competing demands. Ray and Anderson’s research suggests a higher correlation between inward soul searching and mindful change-making, as core Cultural Creatives are more likely to contemplate the deeper motivations behind their values.
Moderns & Traditionalists
Moderns and Traditionalists, in contrast, represent the antithesis of Cultural Creative values. Moderns stand for the neo-Enlightenment story of ‘homo economicus’, scientific reductionism, material growth and civilized progress.
Comprising half the US population, Moderns are the largest demographic, engineering the dominant social, political and economic pillars of our current system. Emblematic of the status quo, they are the architects of empires and mercenaries of corporate welfare, upholding established institutions such as big business, banking, politics, the military, mainstream media and the criminal justice system. Moderns tend to be driven by lessons pertaining to the accumulation of power, success, wealth and status – valuing rational self-interest, conformity to established norms and extrinsic motivation above inner-directed ethics and ideals.
Traditionalists are cultural conservatives who represent the far, religious right of politics. This group serves the interests of evangelical fundamentalists, puritan ascetics and lawful militants who tend to be rule-bound, god-fearing, and reactionary to progressive movements. Some Traditionalists may share a common thread with Cultural Creatives through their distrust of corporatocracy, techno-fixes and big government, but for different reasons, such as the belief that secularism is destroying old fashioned “family values.”
Reaching out
Ray and Anderson’s research suggests that Cultural Creative core group efforts might be better spent reaching out primarily to greens and transitionalists who, to some extent, already ‘get it’, as opposed to the 39.7% of Moderns and 15.4% of Traditionalists within the general population.
The most striking thing about Cultural Creatives is their coherence as a subculture, according to Ray and Anderson. However, their diffuse mainstream representation and political influence is clouded by the perception that they are alone in their awareness: “No one is more surprised to hear about the arrival of the Cultural Creatives than themselves. Most of them think that their worldview, values and lifestyle is shared by only a few of their friends; they have little notion that there are 50 million of them.” Qualities which often define Cultural Creatives, such as empathy, gentle tolerance, deep relational commitments, strong attachment to values and personal integrity may inadvertently prevent them from organizing politically – directing their efforts alternatively within private practice, philanthropic NGOs, and counter-cultural movements, where bureaucratic rigidities are less prevalent.
Primals & Transpersonalists 
In addition to the three main subcultures, esoteric schools of thought describe two additional groups, which Ray and Anderson have not covered in their research. According to this view, no worldview is necessarily “better” or “worse” – they merely represent different lessons, and thus varying levels of growth, insight and awareness. I call these groups the ‘Primals’ and ‘Transpersonalists’.
Primals encompass members of the indigenous population who are still living in traditional kinship clans or tribes. Their lessons concentrate on primitive survival and living symbiotically with the land. The Primal worldview is soulful and animistic, endowed with an anima mundi of intrinsic meaning and deep communion with nature.
Transpersonalism represents the perspective which theoretically comes after the time of the Cultural Creatives: an ‘old soul’ world which is primarily oriented towards “being” rather than “doing” or campaigning – a time where teaching, harvesting, philosophical questing, compassionate non-attachment, and the transmission of wisdom take higher prominence. While modernity and traditional religion perceive a fundamental separation between self and other, where nature is systematically conquered and objectified for human benefit, primal and transpersonal consciousness views the self as inseparable from the greater whole and mystical wonders of the universe – orienting towards mindful simplicity and radical acceptance.
Paradigm shift
In The Passion of the Western Mind, Richard Tarnas asserts that all paradigm shifts are conceptually archetypal, as well as socio-historical in nature. Every dominant worldview must undergo its own mythic journey or evolutionary path, passing through developmental sequences of gestation, growth, crisis and revolution: “When a paradigm has fulfilled its purpose, when it has been developed and exploited to its full extent, then it loses its numinosity, it ceases to be libidinally charged, it becomes felt as oppressive, limiting, opaque–something to be overcome–while the new paradigm that is emerging is felt as a liberating birth into a new, luminosly intelligible universe.”
Within the Cultural Creative psyche there is a primal self which needs ritual and sustenance, a Traditional self which regulates boundaries and structure, a Modern self which craves independence and ambition, and a Transpersonal self which seeks unconditional love and wholeness. Cultural Creatives need to be aware of the tendency to become too attached and identified with their convictions for they are prone to becoming overcome with despair when their ideals fail to materialize, believing there is nothing to be gained or learnt from engaging different perspectives.
The Modern worldview is approaching its final limits to growth, catapulting itself into obstinate crisis. But before the seeds of revolution and cultural creative gestation can flourish, lessons of the dominant Modern paradigms need to be authentically integrated. Pushing the limits of affluence and self-interest currently serves a specific purpose for Moderns, in the same way cultivating relationships, inner awareness and social justice does for Cultural Creatives. Such labels and characteristics aren’t fixed; they represent an individual’s internal framework, their primary lessons, and evolving journey.
Jung posited that the unindividuated person believes everyone is, or ought to be, like himself, and that people don’t change until they’ve suffered enough. Likewise, some people need to devote their lives to climbing to the top – projecting their views of success and prosperity onto others – before they begin to question why it isn’t making them happy. Industrial civilization is fundamentally driven to preserve its ‘psychological basic ground’, which must experience the psychic death of its individual, social and collective mythos in order to be transformed.
At some point, activists will inevitably confront the sovereignty of conflicting worldviews and their respective self-serving mythologies, underlying the post-modern collapse of Grand Narratives. We needn’t adopt the nihilistic consequences of post-modernism, surrendering as passive voters and consumers, which Noam Chomsky states would be “pointless” for meeting tangible challenges. Rather, the Cultural Creatives’ influence upon the Information Age signifies a thematic shift towards grassroots participatism, eco-psychological re-integration, and the intentional co-creation of culture. The quest for universal truth is, paradoxically, an emergent, relativistic process, and the imminent epochal meta-narrative we re-imagine will need to encompass a humble, open-hearted acceptance of imperfect plurality.
Further reading: 
  1. http://www.kindredcommunity.com/2013/09/same-planet-different-worlds-how-cultural-creatives-are-bringing-forward-the-practical-wisdom-of-conscious-living/
  1. http://admin.alternet.org/story/10487/the_cultural_creative_paradox
  1. Richard Tarnas, Cosmos and Psyche
  1. Richard Tarnas, The Passion of the Western Mind

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Schmoozing On My Soapbox

What are some of your most unpopular, potentially controversial views and opinions? I wrote up a list of mine as a therapeutic exercise to practice giving less fucks about encountering negative judgment. My views are all subject to questioning and re-evaluation as new information presents itself. Feel free to refute them for yourself if they unintentionally push your buttons, or contribute to the list with recommendations!

  • Voluntary human extinction is preferable to progeny. Choosing to be childfree is an intrinsically noble, ethical and environmentally responsible decision. The population is estimated to reach 11 billion by 2050 - if people would rather not adopt, they need to be honest with their reasons (what about creating a ‘mini me, me, me'?), rather than try to justify why overpopulation isn’t an issue. (Lisa Hymas' article for The Guardian is a fantastic read on the subject.)
  • It’s still unsustainable to depend on renewable energy to sustain our current rates of consumption/way of life without downshifting and pursuing a de-growth paradigm. High tech innovations still require the mining of rare earth metals and oil. I'm not suggesting we need to adopt an extreme primitivist lifestyle, just that low tech alternatives with a gentler environmental footprint are preferable. 
  • Any economic system, which glorifies competition and commodifies our personhood *causes* (not merely correlates with) depression, anxiety, and a range of mental illnesses. Cooperative support networks and human wellbeing would be more in tact if our socioeconomic system worked more like a library. 
  • Unschooling (and progressive models such as Montessori) are the only organised forms of education with any regard for the liberty, individual gifts and democratic representation of its students.
  • Culturally sanctioned monogamy enables infidelity, jealousy, possessiveness and competitiveness, while ridiculously expecting that to somehow bring out the best in people. It perpetuates unrealistic myths of “the one" for the primary goal of homogenising the nuclear family. Nothing against folks with a personal preference for monogamy - I’m just strongly against the idea that it’s somehow wrong or immoral to have multiple loving relationships as a healthy alternative. 
  • Hardline secular humanism creates as much of a moral and existential vacuum as religion when it alienates us from nature, spiritual meaning, and the transpersonal pursuit of wholeness. 
  • Suicidal thoughts can be perfectly rational, and legally assisted euthanasia is justifiable for those who experience mental illness as though it were a terminal condition. By no means am I advocating suicide, or suggesting there is no hope for even the most serious cases. I'm just not dogmatic about the absolute sanctity of life.
  • Caring about climate change and the environment is incomplete without adopting a plant-based diet/lifestyle, especially when factory farming is the single largest cause of unsustainable, ecocidal destruction upon our planet. Source: Cowspiracy
  • People with strong opinions can be profoundly annoying, proud, self-righteous vibekillers (I don’t take myself seriously after all, SO THERE. Will add to this list when I think of more.. ;) 

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Elegance Is Refusal

truth labels of fashion revolution

Originally published in SHIFT Magazine Issue #5 "Planetary Boundaries"

the fine arts are commonly viewed as the lifeblood of passionate, creative activism; from powerful documentaries to emotive protest songs, subversive slam poetry and provocative street stencilling — artivist culture exemplifies a visionary playground of aching possibilities. yet fashion recoils in the shadow of bourgeois luxury, consumer indoctrination and mass-produced, marginalising ideals of beauty — undermining the true cost of garment production and its precarious dependence on the natural world.


unlike many deep green environmentalists however, i’m not so quick to dismiss fashion as completely superficial and irrelevant. fashion needs to evolve, ideally, to inspire new meanings for aesthetic expression, politicized bodies, and the diversity and enrichment of culture. in a system where commodified self-image is sold as identity, we owe it to ourselves and the planet to truthfully elucidate the stories of those who weave, stitch, embroider, design and shelter the sartorial fabric of history.



the life-cycle of clothes

Each year around eighty billion garments are produced worldwide, yet two million tonnes of clothing and textile waste ends up in landfill. The majority of clothing items we buy today are made from non-biodegradable, petrochemical-laden fabrics such as nylon, acrylic and polyester, as well as cotton — much of it genetically modified, subject to a quarter of global pesticide use, and produced using child labour. By 2007, meeting global consumer energy demands required 1074 billion kilowatt hours of electricity, for which we needed 132 million tonnes of coal, and between 6-9 trillion litres of water. Toxic dyes and waste from textile mills are responsible for 20 percent of worldwide water pollution, while exposure to harmful dioxins, synthetic azo dyes, fluorinated chemicals, heavy metals and formaldehyde poses a significant cancer risk for sweatshop labourers and consumers.

As our disposable, low quality donations crowd up thrift shops and end up being shipped to Africa ‘for aid’, charities are forced to operate like businesses, stifling the local garment trade of developing nations. Meanwhile credit card debt continues to soar, as haute couture’s traditional two season turnover (summer/spring, autumn/winter) whirlwinds into fifty two seasons (pre-fall, yacht season, pre-yacht, etc.).  A new outfit for every week means that millions of exploited garment workers worldwide – the majority of whom are women – are forced to work harder for less than a living wage while forbidden to unionize for safe working conditions. It means buying into an ever-growing disregard for animal welfare — live-plucking of geese for quilts, shearing merino “battery” sheep in unlivable conditions for wool production, live-skinning snakes, and threatening the extinction of crocodiles for luxury goods, while streamlining the leather trade through use of carcinogenic preservatives.



According to the Ethical Fashion Guide, 89 out of 128 major brands operating in Australia – including retail giants, Myer, David Jones, Kmart, Target and Zara – don’t guarantee workers a living wage; 51 have not boycotted Uzbekistani cotton; and 49 scored less than a C rating for labour rights management.2 Following the anniversary of the Rana Plaza factory disaster, which killed 1133 and injured 2500 workers, #FashionRevolution was born, urging consumers to pledge to boycott sweatshop slavery. The campaign so far has been a viral success, with events held annually in over 100 countries, led by the inaugural message, “Who made your clothes?” April 24th saw social media activists, Instagrammers and bloggers wearing their clothes inside out, snapping selfies and tagging major fast-fashion brands who needed to be held publicly accountable. “If a brand doesn’t have an ethical responsibility section on their site, that’s the simplest way to tell they aren’t very active in that space,” advises Melinda Tually, co-ordinator of the Australian chapter of Fashion Revolution. “Ensure they’re fair trade, Forest Stewardship Council certified, and signed up to the Bangladesh Fire Safety Accord.”
The Sydney event, hosted by Meetup sustainability initiative, Think Act Change, featured a panel of speakers pioneering innovative solutions within the ethical fashion movement. Sydney-based designer, Fiona Roubin founded her own vintage upcycling label, Fairtale after witnessing mountains of clothes being wastefully discarded to dead stock while working at major fast fashion brand Valleygirl, “Every week we had to go through all the clothes we couldn’t sell and cut them up for trash dumping. It was heartbreaking thinking of the good those clothes could’ve gone to, and how easily they could’ve been donated or discounted.” Fiona now scours op shops for inspiration and creates beautiful, unique one-of-a-kind pieces, re-engineered from pre-loved fabrics. Protective outdoors apparel label, Patagonia documents every step of garment production online through the Footprint Chronicles, which aims to educate consumers on the complexity of the supply chain and pave the way for complete transparency in fashion. Philanthropic enterprises such as The Social Outfit (Sydney) and The Social Studio (Melbourne) have contributed to Fashion Revolution by providing vocational education and training in eco-fashion design and production for newly arrived migrants and refugees. 



Although essential, pioneering changes are evolving within fashion to adopt a more socially conscious vision, there remains an underlying tension as to whether “ethical consumption” is conducive to downshifting towards a truly sustainable economy. Businesses face a conflict of interest regarding profitable turnover and the need to invest in a waste-reducing model of cradle to cradle design. Fashion lovers in a post-growth paradigm could eventually try on samples by local designers and place orders on unmade garments; following the entirety of its construction, as opposed to the mass-produced, instant gratification model we have now. The most diligent approach is embracing slow fashion, says Lucie Siegle, author of To Die For: Is Fashion Wearing Out the World, “The Perfect Wardrobe cannot be solely about acquiring new clothes, even those with a tiny ecological footprint and hewn from a dynamic biodegradable fibre. What you don’t buy is as important as what you do.”  

In essence, Fashion Revolution is about having a relationship with our clothes—consciously honouring the skill, craftsmanship and sacrifice of those who have laboured tirelessly and lost their lives, so that we may afford warmth and luxury on our backs. It encompasses the need to mindfully reduce our ecological footprint — ditching glitzy malls for community artisan markets, hosting swap parties, upcycling old fabrics, taking greater care of garments by hand-washing them naturally and only curating pieces we really love. More fundamentally, we need to resist and reimagine existing constructs of beauty, which require us to buy into a throwaway culture of exploitation and excess. Although it will always be easier to seek security in controlling our possessions and self-image, as opposed to fragile relationships and ephemeral achievements, fashion can only become a positive force of change once its values are underpinned by human rights, environmental justice and principled commitment to our planetary boundaries.

Sunday, August 17, 2014

Quiet Voices With Loud Ideas


I’m not the kind of person who easily succumbs to film and TV addiction, partially because the majority of on-screen characters I’ve seen tend not to be very relatable. Although Lena Dunham’s Girls received a ton of hype for its biting, absurd, no-holds-barred satire of young adulthood, none of the characters reminded me of anyone I knew. You can imagine my delight when Rachel Tucker’s indie web series, Introverts, made its rounds to the relief of personality-conscious darlings internet-wide. 

The series follows three quirky, introverted housemates, Amy, Waltra and Susan, as they navigate the awkward realm of dating, parties and overbearing extraverts who give TMI about their crazy sex lives. As an introvert, I've never had a problem with being respected from a distance or taken seriously, but it can be a struggle to deal with the perception that we're not all that fun to hang out with, especially when your twenties are all about growing through relationally defining rites of passages. Tucker believes that Hollywood paints shyness and introversion in a stereotypical, unhelpful and one-dimensional light, hoping the series will portray a more humorous side to introverts and the adorable idiosyncrasies they possess, even they're too nervous sometimes to order a pizza. 


Why you shouldn't paint all introverts with the same brush:

There are at least eight different broad categories of introversion (and extraversion) according to the Myers-Briggs type indicator, with a multitude of individual variation in between. Introversion exists on a spectrum, and it is likely that in an extraverted culture like ours, a few of your introverted friends may easily be mistaken for extraverts. Introverts aren't necessarily shy to be themselves, as long as they aren't pressured to act like extraverts or made to feel defective for their preferred style of socialising. 

Your E/I orientation doesn't determine how sociable, open or confident you are. It reflects the amount of energy you naturally invest in being either internally or externally centred, whether that concerns things, ideas or other people. To paraphrase Jung, introverts take the external world for granted in favour of their internal essence, while extraverts take the internal world for granted and readily adapt their priorities to external objectives. When extraverts relate to the outside world as their mental playground, they're engaging a macrocosm of an introvert's relationship to their own thoughts, dreams and feelings.  

Now who wants to help me write a web series about strange, tea-sipping librarians? :3

Saturday, July 26, 2014

Why I'm Fired Up About The Hunger Games

Originally published in SHIFT Magazine issue #4 "Cultureshock."


I have an unsponsored kleenex confession to make: i cried during the hunger games. and no, it wasn’t because katniss put peeta in the friend zone; a squandered opportunity at cultural critique is far more tragic. my crying was strictly muted in choked up sniffles to comply with movie theatre etiquette while fidgeting wide-eyed children in the audience sat captive, transfixed in cinematic oblivion.



For those who have been media detoxing, vigilantly eschewing popular culture, The Hunger Games is set in the dystopian, post-collapse civilisation of Panem, a futuristic depiction of North America ruined by climate change, resource depletion, and despotic dictatorship. Following a failed uprising the population is violently pacified into poverty, slavery, and oppression by a fascist, Orwellian police state – appointed to serve a wealthy elite in the technologically advanced Capitol. Child tributes are chosen from each district to fight to the death in the annual Hunger Games as a defeating reminder of the Capitol’s power. The contestants are groomed in the art of spinning a persuasive celebrity PR campaign to gain votes, brainwashing viewers to idolise their entertainment value as freedom fighters in a televised war.

If that doesn’t sound eerily familiar enough, Suzanne Collins was inspired to write the popular young adult series following the 2003 Iraq invasion, where leaked footage of civilian deaths were reported as patriotically as the Super Bowl. While protagonist Katniss grappled with the psychological assault of grief and conscription following the death of her father in a tragic mining disaster, the US was “making the world safe for democracy” (credit to Bernays et al) and conducting peak oil “counter-terrorism” black operations for a Brave New World Order. 
The most ironic thing about the film’s critical reception was, of course, its commercialised fandom. Glossy magazine shoots of Jennifer Lawrence, talk show appearances, and high fashion modelling deals disturbingly parallel her character’s role as a figurehead of mass cultural distraction. The mocking jay brooch, which was given as a keepsake to Katniss as a symbol of the revolution, can be bought online for $9.95, along with video games, costumes, figurines, and speculation of a soon-to-be-opened Hunger Games theme park. (I wonder if families will be able to take their kids for a nice camping trip in the mock bloodbath arena?)
Hollywood is full of grandiose representations of heroic journeys, yet deeper thematic truths are rarely internalised beyond simplistic, war-mongering clichĂ©s of retributive morality. I have to concur with [best-selling young adult author] John Green that the Hunger Games falls short of extrapolating its full, untapped, allegorical potential. Collins, whose father suffered severe PTSD after serving in Vietnam, intended for the series to teach kids about the brutal realities of war. Yet our Military-Infotainment Industrial Complex has repressed that reality into a diluted, water-cooler narrative of star-crossed lovers and playground rivalry. While Lord of the Flies conceptualized violence as innate to human sociobiology, the most ruthless, bloodthirsty child soldiers in the Hunger Games were understood to be victims of their fascist programming. Pacifistic, reconciliatory ideals incorporating empathy and understanding towards ‘the enemy’ are unacceptable, if not dangerous, to an imperialist agenda. Hence the film’s critical message is lost within its own transnational public relations matrix.
The tragedy of the Hunger Games is not that it is emotionally violent, but that its context is perceived to be inconsequentially fictional. The legacy of Panem mirrors our own Sixth Great Extinction and systemic neurosis so precisely; we fail to recognise it is even happening.  


Afterthoughts

“ya know, i’d heard so much about the hunger games, but never watched until your article submission came. i then watched the first two back to back and really saw what you were getting at. it’s such a shame, because this series has awesome potential to teach a generation a much-needed lesson or few. frankly i thought it was genius packaged for hollywood, so not quite where i would have pitched it, but precisely where it needed to be pitched to reach a mass audience without actually losing the message/s. i do hope that even if many people don’t fully internalize the messages yet that they will when the shit hits the fan for them and they are forced to reflect. the ironies are just too bitter and i could just see you tearing your hair out in cassandra-like frustration over how few people will take it all as intended. perhaps the makers could have done better to shy away fron the merchandising and celebrity culture of it all, and the actors could have done their bit on that front too. but then there is the catch-22 of needing to promote… sigh…” 
— a fitting email response from shift editor, kari @the overthinker

Monday, May 26, 2014

Activism and the Gifts of Imperfection

Originally published in SHIFT Magazine Issue #3 "The Power of We."

In our individualistic, identity-asserting culture of conditional worth and comparative selfhood, it can feel as though every triumph and tribulation is scrutinised as a defining fault of personal character. As activists and global citizens, we face enough pressure from reigning ideologies and the media telling us how to live and be A Worthwhile Person that it’s sometimes difficult to differentiate when we’re helping the world from when we could be hurting it, and by reflection, ourselves. 

I remember being taught that a worthwhile person is one who, deeply and correctly, introjects the dominant values of his or her culture; one who wears a managed heart of unutterable dreams, setting every sleepless alarm to the clockwork grind of cunning success and civil obedience. those who make a conscious decision to take te path less travelled, to dedicate time capsules for a brighter future they may not live long enough to inherit, suddenly appear to the world as deluded dreamers and maladjusted iconoclasts. as the gap widens between our fearless change-making ideals and the battle cries of our wounded inner child struggling to rise to the challenge, we become truth-seeking veterans, fighting to make peace with our cruelest limitations.


If you’re reading this, chances are you’re interested in changing the world somehow, even if you might be a little skeptical that we have the will and motivational resources, collectively, to do so. Determined not to reduce my raison d’ĂȘtre to an existential vacuum of commodified apathy, I was desperate to take control of my own learning and discovered activism in my late teens. I shopped around for like-minded communities that I resonated with, and ended up volunteering with an organisation that did some pretty ground-breaking paradigm shifting at the time. Thursday nights were spent handing out flyers in front of the Martin Luther King mural in Newtown, and setting up a projector screen for free documentary screenings – from The Century of Self toThe CorporationZeitgeist and The Story of Stuff. I will never forget the heartwarming chance encounters, though they still sadden me to do this day, like talking with homeless street kids who thanked us for our work but were consumed with thoughts of how to get their next liquor fix and a warm body for the night.
Being involved with a genuinely inspiring community meant I wanted to be more like the activists I admired, so I made a habit of sneaking out to co-ordinated meetings. The team was planning a series of lectures and media artivism events, where the archetypes of confident public speaker, social butterfly promoter, articulate intellectual and the artistically skilled were in highest demand. Of course, there were behind the scenes technical and administrative positions, but on the whole, figuring where I fitted in seemed like the ultimate square peg proposal – “here are all the roles available in taking the world by storm, now pick one” (or as many as you like or can handle). Naturally my reaction was, “well, as a socially anxious, moderately depressed 18 year old with a low pain tolerance for being in the most dim lit of spotlights, I suck at all of these, so I think I’ll stick up posters and frisbee paper cuts at ducking yuppies instead.” Pamphleteer, by The Weatherthans,  became my theme song for those restless next few months, “Facing rush hour faces turned around / How causes dance away from me / I am your pamphleteer.” Meanwhile I kept secretly praying, “Please universe, don’t let me attract any argumentative pseudo-intellectroll types. And don’t you dare mistake me, fedora wearing dude with the crumpled tie, for a religious cult evangelist before you read the damn flyer.”
Fast forward three years, and my awkward pamphleteering days are behind me. I’m compelled to think more critically about what works for me and what doesn’t regarding activism commitments, while pensively reconciling why it took me so long to start believing in my potential. I’m happy to leave the sharp-tongued political debating and verbal sparring to the pros, while I go about my business reading, writing, collecting inspiration, learning as much as I possibly can about how the world works, and perhaps attempting to shift the change-making dialogue into something a little more personal.
When a friend opened up to me recently about loved ones who were vilified and excluded from so called activist “safe spaces” on the basis of having a disability, suddenly it hit home that if I felt peripheral and insignificant, imagine how damaging that is for disadvantaged minorities accustomed to universally inadequate representation. You might be familiar with the homogenised stereotype of the ideal humanitarian / bleeding heart philanthropist: able-bodied, highly educated, time and money-privileged enough to afford volunteer commitments, naturally disciplined and consistent with face-of-the-campaign charisma. Never mind the fact that we’re all fundamentally different in our temperamental wiring, inclinations and abilities. Some people are sturdy as a golden pancake when spreading themselves thin with commitments; others are gifted in slower, more specialised settings, oriented towards depth rather than breadth. Neither style of contribution is better or worse, deserving of guilt or preferential treatment. It’s disheartening to comprehend how some people aren’t even being granted basic respect for their contributions, let alone the appropriate guidance and recognition they deserve.
There’s also an unspoken expectation in some activist communities that volunteers should be able to easily assimilate, take on mountains of responsibility, not question how things are run, nor assert their individual needs for support and facilitation. Newsflash: some of the most dedicated, well-intentioned and compassionate of us could never live up to such a lofty ideal. My concern is that change-making communities can easily fall into the trap of standardising team productivity at the expense of individual self-determination. In reality, people are more nuanced, fascinating and complex than the utilitarian embodiment of a mission statement. No one deserves to feel like their best isn’t good enough. Failing to prioritise the integration of greater diversity and inclusiveness means change making organisations are at risk of alienating the very lifeblood of their message: their supporters.
In all fairness, most organisations would willingly make changes if they were aware of the steps needing to be taken. In most cases, it’s left up to minorities to speak up about their needs, which is problematic if they’re new, doubtful or afraid of being judged. Credible organisations have a duty of care to their volunteers to abide by a code of ethics, which includes being accountable to anti-discrimination and equal opportunity principles. It’s the vested attitudes and unconditional acceptance of those personally involved, however, who have the power to shift relational schemas from ‘role culture’ (exclusionary groupthink) to ‘people culture’ (celebrating differences and individual expression.) 


Art therapy @ The Indigo Project support group, Sometimes I Freak Out
Head psychologist and founder of the Indigo Project, Mary Hoang, who has experience facilitating disadvantaged groups, and believes the most important qualities we can use to build rapport within emerging communities are congruence and authenticity, states: 

"[in my work with disadvantaged youth], kids can tell when you’re not being real with them. they need personable, down to earth mentors, who are relatable because of their varied life experiences. using mindfulness strategies teaches the importance of being present and in the moment with each other. we’re able to speak more relevantly to people from all walks of life if they know we don’t claim to be living our lives perfectly either."

Change-making communities don’t have to pretend to know everything about every marginalised group, but they do need to sensitively and confidentially open up a dialogue with activists who might have special needs to feel safe enough to talk about it.

 "the best approach is to treat people as individuals, where everyone is valued and respected for their diverse range of skills and passion for our cause."

Mary attributes her organisation’s success to the contribution of a multi-disciplinarian team of interns, creative professionals and volunteers.
"the project is bigger than me now, it’s grown into something which involves entire communities we work with. we want to help people find a purpose they can align with, so life imbues a fresh sense of meaning. i think those who have gone off the well-worn tracks, ventured into uncharted parts of themselves, and got themselves into trouble, tend to have the most interesting things to say about life. when inner fulfilment isn’t about the day to day grind anymore, people have this need to connect with something beyond themselves, to help others along their journey as well."

Maya Angelou once truthfully articulated, “There is no agony like bearing an untold story inside of you.” I wonder if the invisible elephant in the room is that we don’t know each other well enough to understand where to begin dismantling structural divisions. We know every argument and counter-argument inside out as to why transnational trade agreements screw people over, but we’re rarely mindful and aware of what makes our fellow activists tick on an individual level. We cannot create a new epochal mythology, which is holistically resonant, as long as we remain black boxed, like wasted, unwanted gifts to each other. Our darkest struggles shouldn’t be treated as character flaws or a burden upon the community, but an outlet for expressing the relatable nature of our fears, complementary motivations, and understated capacities. I’m hoping that earth community leaders will take the initiative to collate priority research into activist facilitation needs; either through comprehensive surveys, skill-sharing, personal development workshops, or friendly orientation meetings. Forgotten activists, particularly those of the ego-deficient variety, deserve to feel confident telling their stories – subverting the standard narrative of ghostwritten selfhood, as though it were radically reimagined in the glossy pages of a centrefold.

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Voices of a Generation

Originally published in SHIFT Magazine Issue #2 "Economise"

i’m reaching that daunting point in life where i have to start planning a career path in order to be taken seriously as a young adult. despite my personal view that careers are an artificial construct of economic conscription, rather than an inspiring signifier of moral prosperity, i’m anxiously adapting to a cutthroat culture of meritocratic musical chairs in a highly convincing game of class conscious monopoly.

i wish my words were enough to seal that next paycheck, to keep a roof over my head, to prove i’m worthy and human enough to earn a humble living among the towering chess pieces of industrial civilisation. instead i find myself playing dead on desks with my bachelor of adulthood; stuttering clumsily through interviews and panicking at performance reviews. my dreams are carefully nested within a usufruct matrix of violent financial roulette, among the mere paper shuffling of entire empires, vulnerable communities and ecosystems. i am a second generation survivor of history’s war-torn vietnamese arms race, a potential future climate refugee, a disposable human resource sheltering from the blow of imminent collapse; one of the lucky ones like you, at least for now.

I don’t claim to speak on behalf of my generation, but one rarely disputed truth millennials have in common is we will likely end up inheriting a world which is far more geopolitically volatile, ecocidal and impoverished than our predecessors might have dared to imagine. Evidence shows that young people are hit hardest during a recession, and a survey of my millennial peers reveals that, despite our differing positions on the political compass, I’m not alone in feeling the overwhelming crunch of an insecure, uncertain future. 
Chelsea*, 25, believes young people today have been sold lies and raised on platitudes about the world being their oyster – that they can accomplish anything they want if they simply work hard enough and follow their dreams: “While unemployed for 2 years, I have $150,000 in student loan debt after receiving a first rate post graduate education with the promise of a brighter future.” Ryan*, 22, a public relations student at Swinburne University, is also worried about rising costs of living and making ends meet while trapped in an inevitable debt spiral: “The concern that even after I finish my degree, the ability to find a job worthwhile enough to be able to support me and pay off my debts is becoming more and more alarming. Instead of being able to save for my future or even for a car, I am having to live pay check by pay check, and, when not working, I have to deal with surviving on the bare minimum. As a university student, the growing economic problems facing me relate to my inability to both study and hold a part-time job sufficient enough to allow me to live outside of home. The need for independence is what everyone in their early twenties wants, but because of the rise in basic utilities, transport, groceries and rent, it’s becoming harder and harder to reach.”
According to the 2013 Pedestrian Youth Reportwhich surveyed over 2000 respondents aged 18-29, 64.7% of young Australians are anxious about lack of financial security, while feeling the strain of being poor in a wealthy country. 98.8% of us want to pursue work we’re passionate about, but 64.4% are concerned that the number of job seekers will continue to outnumber meaningful employment opportunities. With the youth unemployment rate reaching crisis levels of up to 20% in some parts of the country, Sarah*, 21, who is studying pharmacy at Sydney University thinks we have a right to be concerned: “In terms of job prospects after uni, I’m not holding out on too much hope. I know it’s fierce competition, and most likely the best of the best will be on top (with a dash of very good luck). But, after all, there are still people getting work that aren’t that great too, so I just need to work from the bottom and keep climbing.” Unsurprisingly, university students face three times the stress levels of the general population, with a fifth developing serious mental illness, according to a 2010 reportThe pressure to become financially independent without clear, definite transition pathways between study and stable employment is especially alienating to young people who lack social support and experience when they graduate, “It’s difficult to try and make new connections that can help in the future with job recommendations and advice, so right now I know it’s going to be a tough ride.”
Amir*, 28, works in the community services industry and stresses that, with limited support, young people face the difficulty of needing to either settle or hustle in pursuit of social mobility and strangled ambition: “Employers can be ruthless when profitably incentivised to downsize job security and avoid paying new recruits appropriate wages. In my experience working with youth at the PCYC, young people do not have the skills or tools to proactively seek work and opportunities. Nowadays youth have to use their initiative and be a little bit creative.” Competing in an unstable job market means many twenty-somethings have to work an average of seven jobs before securing an established career. It means fewer entry-level positions, while more advanced training and education is required to adapt to an information-based economy. Psychologists have even coined a new developmental phase, “emerging adulthood” to characterise the reinvention, or delaying, of traditional milestones driven by cultural and economic pressures, such as graduating, moving out, gaining financial independence, marriage, and starting a family.
Australia’s inflating property bubble has estranged a generation of prospective homebuyers into lifelong renters, with 68.2% believing they will never be able to afford a mortgage while independently supporting themselves. Danielle*, 26, a graphic designer working from home, has dealt with difficult tenancy arrangements while struggling to maintain a consistent income that pays the bills and suits her temperament: “I’ve witnessed some people rent out their living rooms or keep several people to one room, just to pay property costs. My roommate was so concerned about paying the rent she let a random guy stay in our empty room without much background checking. Right now, I get most concerned about the instability of a weekly income. Since moving out of home I’ve found it difficult to get hold of a stable income, relying upon transient contracts and some savings to pay bills.” 

To get an idea of how disproportionate Australia’s salary-to-property ratio is, the average Aussie earned $28,000 per year in 1990 with a $71,000 mortgage. While middle class families today earn $44,000 more per year, Australian property prices have risen to be among the world’s highest, with houses and apartments in Sydney averaging between $475,300-$656,400 (Source: Cosmopolitan magazine August 2013, “So You Want to Buy A House?”)Progressive thinking twenty-somethings are inevitably prompted to question the dominant live-to-work mentality of owning a bigger house, car, baby stroller, etc. at 4.9% interest, quitting the cult of status anxiety and affluenza in favour of simpler, more meaningful lives.


The students I spoke to emphasised the need for practical quick-fix solutions to alleviate immediate economic pressures before feeling hopeful enough to propose potential systemic changes. The fact that debt, unemployment, cost of living and inequality are such central concerns to young people reflects the brutal reality that our right to survival is coercively conditional. 

A subsidised universal basics discount card could complement government Newstart, Youth allowance and rent assistance packages, suggests Andreas*, 27. Most students reject the entitled Gen Y stereotype, and abide by the assumption that if they want a highly comfortable, luxurious lifestyle, they’re going to have to work for it. “Convention has it that you have to work 9-5, Monday to Friday, to afford the bills and some extras on the side. However, if you’re averse to that lifestyle, paying the bills doesn’t come easy.” Young people aren’t pushing for more generous cash handouts so they can spend recklessly on anything they want. Rather, they’re requesting sponsored discounts from the big guys who can afford it on a range of basic necessities, such as food, electricity, internet, textbooks, and potentially free access to public transport to help them transition toward greater independence.
We know that being poor adversely affects health and lifestyle choices, while the fast food and liquor industries continue to target their marketing predominantly at young people. “Encouraging supermarkets to endorse generous student discounts may incentivise young people to start cooking for themselves, which works out to be much cheaper and healthier than blowing $150 a week on takeaway,” says 24 year old nutrition student, Kelsey*. Alleviating the stress of mundane financial burdens will enable young people to save up and plan for their futures more holistically, freeing up time to devote to things that really matter to them, such as travel, health and fitness, personal growth, and relationships. “It can initially be tricky to balance being financially independent and having free time – it’s one or the other for most people, but I think it’s possible, in time, to have both.”
In order for millennials to feel more confident about their future, perhaps governments need to reassess their priorities, and start valuing Gross National Wellbeing (GNW) as an indicator of economic prosperity above GDP alone. If we’ve learned anything from past student protest movements – the London student riots being a prime example – it’s that elected leaders aren’t very good at empathising with the needs of young people. We should be able to vote directly on issues affecting us, such as education cuts and climate change, which 82.2% of surveyed respondents believe demands stronger action. Policymakers can only help young people succeed if they recognise the complexity of emerging adulthood as an integral life stage; filled not just with financial challenges, but ethical dilemmas, identity exploration, existential wanderlust, and an opportunistic sense of being “in between” liminal possibilities.
*All names have been changed to protect the privacy of interviewees in this article.